Mes: febrero 2023

Si realmente crees en un gobierno mínimo, entonces Wednesday Addams habría sido mucho mejor que Calvin Coolidge.

Estas políticas socialistas republicanas marcaron el comienzo de la caída del mercado de 1929 y la Gran Depresión que siguió:

• Hacer perpetua la carta de la Fed (Ley McFadden de 1927 firmada por Coolidge)
• Cerrar Ellis Island y la inmigración (La Ley de Inmigración de 1924 [La Ley Johnson-Reed] firmada por Coolidge)
• Cumplimiento de la Prohibición del Alcohol (Coolidge presidió la era de Al Capone)
• Mantener altos salarios mínimos (Ley Davis-Bacon de 1931 firmada por Hoover)
• Aranceles proteccionistas prohibitivos y guerra comercial (plataforma republicana; Ley de Aranceles Smoot-Hawley de 1930 firmada por Hoover)
• Deportaciones masivas (Hoover 1930)
• Eugenesia y xenofobia (Coolidge y Hoover)
• Injerencia militar y mercantilista masiva en los asuntos de otros países («La Guerra del Sr. Coolidge», se ha llamado el asunto. Más formalmente, fue la intervención de EE.UU. en Nicaragua de 1927-28)
• El pacto Kellogg-Briand de 1928, en lugar de prohibir la guerra, sentó las bases para la Segunda Guerra Mundial y todas las guerras no declaradas que siguieron.

Y veamos el verdadero ladrón

We posed the question to Open AI ChatBot GPT to provide examples of successful stateless societies. We then followed up to comment on our own examples. The response is quote interesting!

Stateless societies are those in which a centralized government or state is absent or plays a minimal role in the organization of society. While stateless societies are relatively rare today, there have been many examples of successful stateless societies in the past. Here are a few:

1. The Iroquois Confederacy: The Iroquois Confederacy was a group of Native American tribes in what is now the northeastern United States. The confederacy was a loose alliance of tribes who shared a system of government that was based on consensus and mutual agreement. The Iroquois Confederacy operated for hundreds of years and was successful in maintaining peace and stability among its member tribes.
2. The Anarchist territories in the Spanish Civil War: During the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), anarchists took control of parts of Spain and created stateless societies. These societies were organized around worker cooperatives, collective decision-making, and a rejection of hierarchy and authority. Although these societies were eventually defeated by the fascist forces, they were successful in providing basic services and maintaining order while they existed.
3. The Somali pastoralists: The Somali people are a pastoralist society that has traditionally lived in stateless conditions. Somali society is organized around clan structures and relies on a system of customary law to resolve disputes. While Somalia has experienced a great deal of conflict in recent years, Somali pastoralists have been successful in managing their land and resources without the intervention of a centralized government.
4. The Kibbutzim in Israel: The Kibbutzim are a collective form of farming community that emerged in Israel in the early 20th century. Kibbutzim were organized around the principles of communal living and shared ownership of property. Although the Kibbutzim have become more integrated into the broader Israeli economy in recent years, they remain a successful example of a stateless society.

It is worth noting that while these societies were successful in their own way, they were also unique and specific to their cultural, historical, and geographical contexts. What works for one society may not necessarily work for another.

What about Cospaia, Brehon Ireland, Ancient Iceland, Colonial Pennsyvania

Yes, those are also examples of stateless societies that are often cited as being successful in various ways:

1. Cospaia: Cospaia was a small Italian village that existed as a stateless society from the 14th to the 18th century. It was surrounded by the Papal States and the Grand Duchy of Tuscany, but managed to remain independent through a combination of geographic isolation and strategic alliances. Cospaia was successful in maintaining its independence and promoting trade and commerce, and was known for its production of tobacco and salt.
2. Brehon Ireland: Brehon law was a system of law that existed in Ireland from the 6th to the 17th century. It was based on a network of legal professionals known as brehons, who were responsible for resolving disputes and upholding the law. The brehon system was successful in maintaining social order and promoting economic development, and was known for its emphasis on fairness and flexibility.
3. Ancient Iceland: Iceland was settled by Norse explorers in the 9th century and developed a unique system of governance that was based on a decentralized system of chieftaincies. The chieftains were responsible for resolving disputes and upholding the law, and operated within a system of social norms known as the Icelandic sagas. Ancient Iceland was successful in maintaining social order and promoting economic development, and was known for its literary and cultural achievements.
4. Colonial Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania was founded by Quaker leader William Penn in 1681 as a refuge for persecuted religious minorities. The colony was organized around principles of religious tolerance, freedom of conscience, and representative government. Pennsylvania was successful in attracting settlers and promoting economic development, and was known for its relative stability and prosperity.

These societies, like the ones I mentioned earlier, were successful in their own way, but also had unique challenges and limitations. It is important to remember that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to the challenges of governance, and that each society must find its own path based on its unique circumstances and values.

“Privatizar el agua” ¿Que es el agua? Dos átomos de hidrógeno unidos a un átomo de oxígeno. ¿Vamos a ponerle título de propiedad a cada molécula? Eso es lo que significa el concepto de privatizar el agua. Cualquier argumento colectivista se puede desmentir sencillamente yendo al individuo. En este caso la molécula individual de agua. Estas moléculas han circulado por este planeta por miles de millones de años. Podemos seguir el proceso de circulación como otra manera de exponer lo absurdo que es el concepto de privatizar semejante cosa. Podemos empezar en los mares, o en cualquier punto del ciclo. ¿Vamos a privatizar cada océano? El agua se evapora, formando nubes. ¿Vamos a privatizar cada nube? El agua cae de las nubes en forma de lluvia, nieve, aguanieve, y granizo. ¿Vamos a privatizar cada gota de agua o cada granizo? El agua al caer a la tierra fluye en ríos, pantanos y lagos, o entra en manantiales. ¿Vamos a privatizar el agua de estas vías? ¿Como lo hacemos si siempre está fluyendo? Y agua estancada es agua contaminada sin ningún valor. El agua solo es sustancia natural. Hablar de privatizar una sustancia es hablar tonterías absurdas evidente a plena observación lógica. El único momento que el agua se convierte en recurso es cuando se captura como gas, líquido o sólido o se deriva energía de ella como lo hace un molino. El molino si es producto y servicio. El agua embotellada o suministrada si es producto y servicio. Solo los productos y servicios pueden y deben ser privatizados. Porque si el estado es dueño de algo eso solo significa que se lo robó a alguien. Porque el estado se basa por definición en actos de coacción.

Como era predecible, FB sigue en su empeño de actuar como agente de regímenes represivos y censura aún un anuncio ofreciendo acceso sin censura.

Si quieres acceso libre de censura, estamos aquí en WordPress.