Me complace enormemente anunciar que Lucrecia Monterroso ha aceptado el puesto de Directora Ejecutiva (CEO) de Red Mises América – Mises América Network, sucediendo a Alfonso Gutiérrez, quien ha anunciado su retirada. Quiero expresar nuestro reconocimiento y gratitud por el trabajo, dedicación y esfuerzo de Alfonso durante su gestión al frente de la organización, enfrentando numerosos desafíos. Le deseamos todo lo mejor en sus futuros proyectos.
Lucrecia trae consigo un historial sobresaliente como directora del Instituto Mises Guatemala, donde ha demostrado sus habilidades al liderar un equipo de entusiastas y organizar numerosas conferencias en el país. Su ejemplo ha establecido un estándar de liderazgo que inspira a nuestra organización.
Pronto, Lucrecia presentará su estrategia y visión para el futuro de la organización. Seguiré desempeñando mi papel como director de operaciones y brindaré todo mi apoyo a Lucrecia en esta transición.
Este es un momento emocionante para nuestra organización, ya que bajo el liderazgo de Lucrecia, estamos preparados para alcanzar nuevas alturas.
José Ignacio Mora, Director de Operaciones (COO) Red Mises América – Mises America Network
Reconociendo la importancia vital de Venezuela en el ámbito de la libertad, la Red Mises América – Mises America Network establece representación en Venezuela como muestra de apoyo y compromiso sobretodo durante la severa represión que experimenta este pueblo hermano.
Invitamos a todos los libertarios, liberales y defensores de la libertad a contribuir con su voz en defensa de esta causa. #ImpuestoEsRobo #InflacionEsFraude #CapitalismoEsLibertad #AbolirEscuelasDelEstado #VivaLaLibertadCarajo
Para mejorar el alcance de nuestro mensaje, ahora esta página incluirá las publicaciones de la Red Mises América – Mises America Network además de las individuales correspondiente a esta página.
Si hablamos de la «ley de la selva,» por muy cruel que sea la vida de un animal, el derecho a migrar es innato a todas especies de fauna. El ser humano no tiene menos derecho a migrar que los animales.
Es decepción equivaler la migración con violación a la propiedad privada. La propiedad privada jamás otorga el poder a tener otros como presos secuestrados o como esclavos.
Si tu propiedad privada priva el movimiento libre de otros, entonces eres el agresor y no el defensor.
Precisamente existen las calles y caminos para aportar la habilidad de viajar. Eso no le otorga al viajante el derecho de dañar o dejar contaminado el camino. Pero tampoco ser propietario de un camino extiende a ser propietario de restringir el movimiento libre e inocente de otras personas.
We posed the question to Open AI ChatBot GPT to provide examples of successful stateless societies. We then followed up to comment on our own examples. The response is quote interesting!
Stateless societies are those in which a centralized government or state is absent or plays a minimal role in the organization of society. While stateless societies are relatively rare today, there have been many examples of successful stateless societies in the past. Here are a few:
The Iroquois Confederacy: The Iroquois Confederacy was a group of Native American tribes in what is now the northeastern United States. The confederacy was a loose alliance of tribes who shared a system of government that was based on consensus and mutual agreement. The Iroquois Confederacy operated for hundreds of years and was successful in maintaining peace and stability among its member tribes.
The Anarchist territories in the Spanish Civil War: During the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), anarchists took control of parts of Spain and created stateless societies. These societies were organized around worker cooperatives, collective decision-making, and a rejection of hierarchy and authority. Although these societies were eventually defeated by the fascist forces, they were successful in providing basic services and maintaining order while they existed.
The Somali pastoralists: The Somali people are a pastoralist society that has traditionally lived in stateless conditions. Somali society is organized around clan structures and relies on a system of customary law to resolve disputes. While Somalia has experienced a great deal of conflict in recent years, Somali pastoralists have been successful in managing their land and resources without the intervention of a centralized government.
The Kibbutzim in Israel: The Kibbutzim are a collective form of farming community that emerged in Israel in the early 20th century. Kibbutzim were organized around the principles of communal living and shared ownership of property. Although the Kibbutzim have become more integrated into the broader Israeli economy in recent years, they remain a successful example of a stateless society.
It is worth noting that while these societies were successful in their own way, they were also unique and specific to their cultural, historical, and geographical contexts. What works for one society may not necessarily work for another.
What about Cospaia, Brehon Ireland, Ancient Iceland, Colonial Pennsyvania
Yes, those are also examples of stateless societies that are often cited as being successful in various ways:
Cospaia: Cospaia was a small Italian village that existed as a stateless society from the 14th to the 18th century. It was surrounded by the Papal States and the Grand Duchy of Tuscany, but managed to remain independent through a combination of geographic isolation and strategic alliances. Cospaia was successful in maintaining its independence and promoting trade and commerce, and was known for its production of tobacco and salt.
Brehon Ireland: Brehon law was a system of law that existed in Ireland from the 6th to the 17th century. It was based on a network of legal professionals known as brehons, who were responsible for resolving disputes and upholding the law. The brehon system was successful in maintaining social order and promoting economic development, and was known for its emphasis on fairness and flexibility.
Ancient Iceland: Iceland was settled by Norse explorers in the 9th century and developed a unique system of governance that was based on a decentralized system of chieftaincies. The chieftains were responsible for resolving disputes and upholding the law, and operated within a system of social norms known as the Icelandic sagas. Ancient Iceland was successful in maintaining social order and promoting economic development, and was known for its literary and cultural achievements.
Colonial Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania was founded by Quaker leader William Penn in 1681 as a refuge for persecuted religious minorities. The colony was organized around principles of religious tolerance, freedom of conscience, and representative government. Pennsylvania was successful in attracting settlers and promoting economic development, and was known for its relative stability and prosperity.
These societies, like the ones I mentioned earlier, were successful in their own way, but also had unique challenges and limitations. It is important to remember that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to the challenges of governance, and that each society must find its own path based on its unique circumstances and values.
La palabra capital significa perteneciente a la cabeza. Esa es una buena manera de recordar dónde se encuentra la sede del gobierno. No en una ciudad capital. En tu cabeza. Es allí donde eliges obedecer a un maestro humano autoproclamado para que te gobierne. Es allí donde sostienes la blasfemia y la falsa idolatría del culto estatal. Y es ahí donde se puede derrocar al gobierno. Anarquía significa sin gobernantes. Una vez que eliges no tener ningún gobernante humano sobre ti, te conviertes en anarquista. Significa dirigir tu propia vida y tomar tus propias decisiones y elegir con quién colaborar sin coerciones.
También es importante recordar que el capitalismo y el capital se tratan. Se trata del intercambio libre y voluntario de bienes y servicios basado en un valor acordado. ¿Dónde reside el valor? En tu cabeza. Solo tú sabes lo que estás dispuesto a cambiar por un producto o servicio. El capitalismo es la libertad de usar la cabeza.
capital (adj.) temprano 13c., «perteneciente o relativo a la cabeza», del francés antiguo capital, del latín capitalis «de la cabeza», de ahí «capital, jefe, primero», de caput (genitivo capitis) «cabeza» (de la raíz PIE * kaput- «cabeza»). El significado de «principal, principal, jefe, dominante, primero en importancia» es de principios del 15c. en Inglés. El sentido informal moderno de «excelente, de primera clase» es de 1754 (como una exclamación de aprobación, el primer ejemplo del OED es de 1875), tal vez por el uso anterior de la palabra en referencia a los barcos, «de primera clase, lo suficientemente potente como para ser en la línea de batalla», atestiguado desde la década de 1650, caído en desuso después de 1918.
Ahora Red Mises América – Mises America Network está en Twitter como @redmisesamerica
La censura en FB, la cual actúa bajo ordenes de regímenes represivos y autoritarios, nos causa ir a otros medios para promover el mensaje de la libertad.
RMA - MAN 